Creative writing alums cultivate conjoined creativity
CU Boulder alumni David Gessner and Nina de Gramont have succeeded both as authors and teachers
For a couple of writers who also happen to be a writing couple, David Gessner and Nina de Gramont admit theyāve got it pretty good.Ģż
Gessner (MA, Englā98) is professor and chair of the Department of Creative Writing at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and published nine books, including the New York Times bestsellerĢż.
De Gramontāwho began her masterās degree in the °µĶų½ūĒų creative writing program and completed it at UNCWāis an associate professor in the same department and has published eight works of fiction for both young adults and adults, including the novelĢż.Ģż
![nina david](/asmagazine/sites/default/files/styles/medium_750px_50_display_size_/public/article-image/ninavalentine.jpg?itok=N6ND1BMa)
Nina de Gramont and David Gessner share a moment during "our Boulder days." Photo courtesy of Gramont and Gessner.
āWe are lucky to be where we are,ā says Gessner.
But the couple, who have also lived on Cape Codāthe subject of Gessnerās highly praisedĢżāconfess a sneaking desire to return one day to their favorite place.
āBoulder is still our shining city on a hill, despite the real-estate prices,ā Gessner says.Ģż
But for now, they are content to visit for a month each summer with their teenage daughter, Hadley (āYes,ā de Gramont answers, anticipating a question before itās asked, she was named primarily in honor of Ernest Hemingwayās first wife, Hadley Richardson), where they relish riding their bikes up actual hills.
Gessner and de Gramont met in CUās creative writing masterās degree program in the 1990s. They acknowledge that the programās somewhat experimental emphasis didnāt quite match their own, more traditional narrative approaches, but they found their places nonetheless.
āI tend to be a very obedient student, so I started writing things that were really out there. It was helpful for me to have that, actually. When I returned to what came more naturally to me, I had a better grasp of how to use language and how to use form,ā says de Gramont, who cites Marilyn Krisl and Suzanne Juhasz as influential faculty members.
āIt was sort of a mismatch for me, very experimental. (Program faculty) tended to turn their noses up at any whiff of narrative,ā he says.Ģż
Gessner cites Edward Abbey, Wallace Stegner, Terry Tempest Williams and Philip Roth as early influences: āAbbey was one of my earliest models. I liked the way he could re-create his personality on the page. You canāt wave hands or use voice to create that. Itās an underrated ability.ā
He gravitated toward three faculty members whose work focused more on place and nature, writers Reg Saner and Linda Hogan and English professor Marty Bickman. He also reveled in his life in Boulderāand publishing a cheeky comic strip, āThe Ballad of Boulder,ā in the Boulder Weeklyāin the wake of recovery from testicular cancer. Gessnerās early memoir,Ģż, explores his new life in the West, what Stegner called, āthe geography of hope.āĢż
Abbey was one of my earliest models. I liked the way he could re-create his personality on the page. You canāt wave hands or use voice to create that. Itās an underrated ability.ā
āIt was about my awakening and coming back to health, having time to write in a stunningly beautiful place, Eldorado Springs,ā Gessner says. He knocked the book out in a month and a half, setting a pattern for future writing projects. āI build, build, build, then blast them out.ā
With the pending publication ofĢżA Wild, Rank PlaceĢżin 1997,ĢżGessner decided that āit wouldnāt do for a Cape Cod nature writer to be living in Colorado,ā and the couple moved to his motherās empty house on the Cape.
āThat was both a romantic time and a crazy-making time. People think Cape Cod is all about Kennedys and rich folk, but in February, itās more like the Arctic,ā Gessner says. āFor us, it was a great and fruitful writing period.ā
De Gramont sold her first book while living on Cape Cod, the short-story collectionĢż, winner of the Discovery Award from the New England Booksellers Association. Gessner, meanwhile, was writingĢż, judged a āclassic of American nature writingā by the Boston Globe.
Gessner also began commuting two hours to teach in the extension and summer writing programs at his alma mater, Harvard, where he would later create the schoolās creative nonfiction writing program. When he was named to a Briggs-Copeland Lectureship at Harvard, the couple moved to Cambridge, taking up residence in the apartment of the late Irish playwright and poet Seamus Heaney and welcoming Hadley to the family.
In 2002, following the success ofĢżReturn of the Osprey, UNCW invited Gessner to interview for a job in its Creative Writing Department. He got the job, and the couple has lived there ever since.
āWeāre always angsting a little bit, āWhy arenāt we out West? Why arenāt we up North?āā Gessner says. āBut we have two really good jobs in the same program. This is where our daughter grew up. And my writing has grown being hereāthe fact that Iām not writing book after book on āI love this placeā; Iām not trying to write āWaldenā three times in a row about Boulder and Cape Cod.āĢż
De Gramont recently submitted a new novel to her agent, and Gessner is working on a book entwining the stories of Theodore Roosevelt and Bears Ears National Monument in Utah. In 1906, Roosevelt signed the Antiquities Act, which gives presidents the authority to create national monuments on federal lands to protect significant natural, cultural or scientific features. Bears Ears has become a political battleground between factions that want to either preserve or exploit natural landscapes
āI spent basically two months out there in Bears Ears this summer to experience it,ā says Gessner, who also blogs atĢżBill and Daveās Cocktail Hour. āThe book will be a history of the Antiquities Act woven together with the biography of a very charismaticāand potentially racist toward Native Americansāpresident. ā¦ I want to bring readers to the subjects through the prism of my own, more limited self, getting to the bigger issues through a human conduit.ā
Ģż